Subject | Re: The closest we'll get to nospam admitting to an error (was: ISO value names are becoming ridicul |
From | Sandman |
Date | 01/13/2016 13:14 (01/13/2016 13:14) |
Message-ID | <sandman-f97aad1f1aa38b37c305120b40b994e2@individual.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | nospam |
Followups | Sandman (1d, 23h & 30m) |
Haha, deflection at its finest :-DSandmannospam
I am eager to read your reply to see you admit to making numerous incorrect statements, apologizing for your sarcastic and inflammatory remarks and pointing some minor detail you may have gotten correct in one message.
i'm still waiting for you to answer the questions i asked. feel free to do so before i post the responses.
i did not make any inflammatory remarks. it was you who began the attacks and derailed it because you can't refute what i said.Refuted so many times over now that your desperate grasping for straws is.
So you still don't get it... Pity.Sandmannospam
Chances are bigger that you'll deflect, ignore the topic and claim victory based on something incredibly minor that you did get correct which turns out wasn't even in contradiction to something I've said, all the while not acknowledging that you were incorrect and has been proven wrong. :-D
you didn't prove anything wrong. what you did was intentionally confuse the issue and hope nobody noticed.
and let's not forget that you've abandoned several threads in which you were shown to be wrong.Such as?