Subject | Re: nospam still hiding in the tall grass (was: The closest we'll get to nospam admitting to an erro |
From | Whisky-dave |
Date | 02/01/2016 11:49 (02/01/2016 02:49) |
Message-ID | <f02aca2a-6cf8-4532-bbf6-d82439de2076@googlegroups.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | nospam |
nospamcouldnt care less.
In article <45ce5641-71d7-4f1d-8a89-c6a53ed6fb00@googlegroups.com>, Whisky-dave <whisky.dave@gmail.com>wrote:nospamWhisky-davenospamkodak filed for bankruptcy. saying film is dead is not wrong.Whisky-dave
Doesn't make it dead, just less used than it was. The word dead has particualar uses perhaps you need to find a more apt word for film than dead.
it's an expression. only an idiot would take it literally.
Only a moron woud use the word dead to decribe such a thing.
it's common usage.
<http://www.theverge.com/2016/1/28/10864034/windows-phone-is-dead> With a lack of hardware, lack of sales, and less than 2 percent market share, it's time to call it: Windows Phone is dead.Look up what the word "dead" really means. It really means no longer fuctioning not no ones buying or making it.
Yes it is. I thought you knew a little about anologue to digital conversion. lest test you which is 'best' if you want the best resolution a 4 bit D-A, 8 bit D-A, 12 bit D-A, 14 bit D-A, a 1028 bit D-A.Whisky-davenospam
Analogue IS bettere than digital only someone that doesn;t understand digital would say something like that. You doi know that digital decribes an analogue signal chopped up into descrete pieces. You'd have to be really stupid to not understand that....
it's not chopped up into discrete pieces.
go learn something about sampling theory before you say more stupid shit.go for it then.
Yes and anolugiue is best thast way the convert the reading your light meter give down to Digital value so it can be more easily used and stored.Whisky-davenospam
this is why ACC is 'better' than MP3 and why loss-less is better than both. But there;s lots of peole liek you that think the MP3s they have are better than the original recording because they have beat headphones ot turn the bass up.
this isn't about lossy versus lossless. it's about digital versus analog.
So back to talking shit again. To be expected.nospamWhisky-daveWhisky-davenospam
Just like smartphones are better cameras than 'cameras' .
not every situation requires an slr. a smartphone fits into your pocket and is always with you.
So it;'s better than a DSLR is it ?
absolutely, when you don't have an slr. an slr doesn't fit in a pocket.
the best camera is the one that you have with you.well at least you got that right. But what if it's a film camera ? Is it still the best camera ?
So whatever sound you record will be anologue what you next do it digitise it.Whisky-davenospam
Microphones are analogue devices.
nobody said otherwise.
the part that is nonsense is that nothing is thrown away when it's digitized.I never said it was. But as you should know a 16 bit colour image is going to be better than a 8 bit one.
Yeah sure.Whisky-davenospam
get yuorself a clue. http://www.mix-engineer.com/audio-philosophy/digital-vs-analog-recording/
Digital vs. Analog - Recording
When it comes to the recording process, analog gear will stay with us for a very long time. Even USB microphones have diaphragms and analog circuitry inside them. You obviously understand nothing.
i understand this far more than you ever will.
usb microphones are digital devices because they have an a/d in them.Are they silver in in colour too, if you paint them gold then they are gold microphones aren't they ?
Then explain why ?nospamthis isn't about lossy compression, it's about digital versus analog.Whisky-dave
Yes and analogue is better, it might NOT be cheaper or smaller size or more convient but that not important in deciding which is best.
analog cannot be better.