Skip to main content
news

Re: The closest we'll get t...

nospam
SubjectRe: The closest we'll get to nospam admitting to an error (was: ISO value names are becoming ridicul
Fromnospam
Date01/12/2016 16:45 (01/12/2016 10:45)
Message-ID<120120161045111831%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
FollowsSandman
FollowupsTony Cooper (50m)
Sandman (1h & 13m) > nospam

In article <sandman-a5118f15eda81e0dd96849bd14e8daa2@individual.net>, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:

Sandman
I've said it before - when proven wrong, nospam either snips the proof or quietly leaves the thread. He would never admit to being wrong, so this is as close as we'll ever get to him admitting to claiming that ISO is a logarithmic scale was an incorrect claim - he abandoned the thread. :-D

i have not abandoned the thread. replies are pending.

The funnies part is all the energy he spent into making sarcastic remarks along the way, and when he realized he was 100% incorrect, he just left with his tail between his legs. :-D

i'm not 100% incorrect.

Tony Cooper (50m)
Sandman (1h & 13m) > nospam