Google| Subject | Re: nospam still not admitting to an error (was: The closest we'll get to nospam admitting to an err |
| From | nospam |
| Date | 01/25/2016 02:37 (01/24/2016 20:37) |
| Message-ID | <240120162037180665%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | PeterN |
| Followups | PeterN (26m) > nospam |
In article <n83tl50o4m@news7.newsguy.com>, PeterN <peter.new@verizon.net>wrote:
except that you generate much of the bs that drives people away.PeterNEric StevensEric StevensPeterN
We have been over all this before. There is no point in going over it again.
So why respond. WTF is the importance.
So why are you putting your oar in?
Because that type of BS drives away the people who have photography as a prime interest, and could be helpful to others.
01/06/2016-
