Subject | Re: nospam still not admitting to an error (was: The closest we'll get to nospam admitting to an err |
From | Sandman |
Date | 01/26/2016 08:20 (01/26/2016 08:20) |
Message-ID | <sandman-746bdd6d0ec81aa5a49e3580f09439ee@individual.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Eric Stevens |
Followups | Eric Stevens (1h & 12m) > Sandman |
Sandman
So why are you doing this all over again? You were proven wrong back then and I would have no problem proving you wrong again using the same facts. Why dig up arguments from the past like this?
Eric StevensI didn't. What you "wrote" was the irrelevant verbiage that even agrees with me and the actual facts. As I showed, you made an incorrect statement and was proven incorrect. For reasons unknown you are now dragging that up again and insisting to make an issue out of it again, even though it was laid to rest almost two years ago.
Why don't you respond to what I wrote rather than almost completely clipping it and dumping a load of irrelevant verbiage?
I had hoped you had changed, but not apparently when your ego is on the line.Wtf? What supposed "ego" of mine is "on the line" here, Eric? Remember, I am not the one that came in to this thread trying to drag up a two year old argument from the past. That's you. For three posts I made it clear I thought it was inappropriate and refrained to join you. But since you insisted I showed clearly and unambiguously how the argument you brought up was concluded and how your statements were shown to be incorrect.