Google| Subject | Re: Proof Sandman keeps running from. |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 08/03/2009 13:17 (08/03/2009 13:17) |
| Message-ID | <mr-04A7BE.13173503082009@News.Individual.NET> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
In article <C69C1451.3F8DC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:
Again, you are stuck snipping my response, not in half, but removing about 90% of it to make it like like I had stated views I never did. Not only that, you had to insert text in your forged quote that was never present in my reply. A double forgery, so to speak.SnitSnitSandman
[1] I will not stop being honest and honorable, no matter how you misrepresent it or what demands you make.
Sandman: [2] Too bad.
[1] <http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/3960b606a8b7c118
[2] <http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d06248dbb4125599
Snit: [1] I will not
[2] Too bad. But if you would change your mind and want to stop lying and trolling, then I would gladly answer your questions, like I would any reasonable person. [1] <http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/3960b606a8b7 c118> [2] <http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d06248dbb412 5599>
Why, that works as well.
Again, Jonas Eklundh, you are stuck snipping my sentences in half to try to make it look like I had stated views I never did.
-- Sandman[.net]
07/30/2009-
