Google| Subject | Re: Proof Sandman keeps running from. |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 07/31/2009 10:07 (07/31/2009 10:07) |
| Message-ID | <mr-66309A.10074731072009@News.Individual.NET> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Snit (8m) > Sandman |
In article <C697E9CB.3EF60%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:
Never happened. I have exposed your lies about them not validating when in fact they did:SandmanSnit
I've had non-validating CSS in the past, and present, yes.
Yet you have cried like a baby and spent years lying about this.
<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/4100ae8ff5c34 b76>
"Are you drunk? It validates perfectly."
You even agreed that it did validate.
I pointed out a number of ways you could improve your site, and you took a fair number of my suggestions.I.e. none.
<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5f4aa3943d81f 87b>
Seriously, I am happy to see you finally admit to what you have been denying for years.I have never denied that I have had non-validating code. I have been too busy exposing your lies.
-- Sandman[.net]
07/30/2009-
