Google| Subject | Re: Proof Sandman keeps running from. |
| From | Steve Carroll |
| Date | 07/31/2009 04:41 (07/30/2009 19:41) |
| Message-ID | <16b26825-362b-47ea-bc09-4dd0872826fb@y4g2000prf.googlegroups.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Sandman (2h & 37m) > Steve Carroll |
On Jul 30, 9:47 am, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:
Snit
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/sandmancheck-html.pdf> <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/sandmancheck-css.pdf>
The WayBackMachine has not a single example of your site validating. Not one, Sandman. How do you explain that?
On Jan 3, 2007 you lied that I somehow forged the data (even though it is all *still* available from the original sources). <http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/50357e0b04c5...> ----- ><http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/sandmancheck-html.pdf> ><http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/sandmancheck-css.pdf> Please stop posting forged PDF's, Michael. >Please explain why the WayBackMachine holds no record of your >site *ever* validating. I have no intention of explaining your lies. ----- You never did explain how you thought I "forged" the data from those sources! And before that you just flip flopped all over trying to figure out if you thought your CSS validated or not. I stated it did not validate on 29 May 2006: <http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c762f549f186...>
07/30/2009-
