Steve Mackay
Snit wrote:

Snit
Steve Mackay stated in post h4srlq$bb7$1@news.albasani.net on 7/30/09 12:15 PM:

You point to the *middle* of a conversation and claim that supports me bringing the topic of the discussion up.

Steve Mackay
That is when YOU brought it up. Sandman did not bring it up previously in that thread.

Snit
Who do you think is foolish enough to believe *that*?

Sandman is the one who keeps lashing out over his anger at his lies being pointed out in 2006.

Steve Mackay
Now Michael, we all know YOU are the one bringing this crap up. It's been proven. No go back under your bridge where you belong, you slimy little troll.

Snit
He should let it go. When he fails to do so, though, and lashes out against me, I reserve the right to remind him - and inform anyone else reading the thread - why Sandman is lying about me.

This is just common sense.

Steve Mackay
Get some help michael. You need it.

Snit
I am not going to debate the obvious fact that you came into the middle of a "situation" and pretend I have started it.

Steve Mackay
I'm not pretending anything. But it's business as usual for you, the pathological liar, to lie about it.

Snit
The question is why... but you will not answer.

Steve Mackay
I have answered. You just pretend I didn't.

Snit
The reason, of course, is the anger you have for past debates you have lost.

Steve Mackay
No. But I'm sure it makes you feel better to believe such nonsense.

Snit
Let them go. You are acting much like Sandman in your obsession with your past errors.

Steve Mackay
No, not really. But this will be my last post to you for a while. I've slapped your sorry ass around enough now. If this continues, you'll just start getting all weird. Forging PDFs, and claiming their originals. The stuff pathological liars like you, do.