Subject | Re: Proof Sandman keeps running from. |
From | Sandman |
Date | 07/31/2009 09:11 (07/31/2009 09:11) |
Message-ID | <mr-035F06.09114631072009@News.Individual.NET> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Snit |
Followups | Snit (5m) Snit (10m) > Sandman |
Errors in my code is my fault, yes. That's what I just said.SnitSteve CarrollSandman
Anyone wanna take a stab at what caused this;)
Fixed. My bad, actually :)
Thanks for pointing out an error on my page in a reasonable mannner that I could swiftly fix.Steve CarrollSandman
Snit... you're claiming that it's *Sandman's* code that is not validating. How were you able to determine that *he* wrote the code that is causing the validation errors you've claimed are from *his* code (as opposed to code generated by the "system" he's using)?
Actually, the "system" (CMS) I'm using is called Atlas and is developed solely by me. So any errors in output would be in direct relation to errors I've made. Sure, I've had employees at times, but 99% of all code is mine. That doesn't mean, of course, that all errors are due to "incompetence" about CSS or HTML, since this is a very dynamic system, lots of the output is the result of the combination of a lot of functions. That means that the CSS (for example) isn't contained as plain text in a text file, it's actually compiled from a number of sources, even database and sent to the browser, at which point errors could be made when parsing or rendering the data.
This makes for a very dynamic system that fits my self-employed kind of business.
You have explained this before... the faults are yours... nobody elses.
You had some code that did not validate.I've had non-validating CSS in the past, and present, yes. Only, I didn't at the time you lied about it - a claim you have yet to show any support for, yet whine like a little girl when I show ample support for you flooding my site almost 300.000 times.
At one point you admitted to it...I have never admitted to your lie about my CSS not validating at the time you claimed it didn't.
then you flip flopped and denied it.Incorrect, as has been explained to you in the past.
Why do you lie about it... it is not like it is *that* big of a deal.If it's not a big deal, why are you dragging your lies up again and again and again, year after year?