Subject | Re: Proof Sandman keeps running from. |
From | Snit |
Date | 08/03/2009 18:50 (08/03/2009 09:50) |
Message-ID | <C69C637D.3F98D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (13h & 59m) |
SandmanYou have no obligation to quote anything I say - in fact, when you went some time ending your trolling of my posts I enjoyed it. But when you do quote me, you should do so *honestly*... but you repeatedly snip context in a dishonest way.
In article <C69C14CD.3F8DD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:SandmanSnitSandmanOf course, I had to snipi away parts of your response and restore parts of what I wrote in order to make the later to be in response to the former - i.e. you like you did.Snit
For crying out loud: you snipped dishonestly and I responded by putting your dishonestly snipped context *back*.
AND dishonestly snipping my reply in the process. You *restored* content and you *removed* content. I.e. you forged the quote.
What, Jonas Eklundh, makes you think I have some obligation to quote your irrelevant grade school insults and clearly false accusations?
What obligation do you think I have to quote your irrelevant trolling?
Your lies, Jonas Eklundh, are well documented. Your accusations enjoy *no* support. This is just a fact. Deal with it.SnitSandman
This whole like of BS from you is just to run from the fact that, in reaction to your belittling others skills, I pointed out problems with sandman.net - including your non-validating CSS. You made improvements based on my comments, but have been lashing out trolling me for *years* over that little "episode". How pathetic of you.
I have been exposing your lies about my CSS for years, yes.