Skip to main content
news

Re: Proof Sandman keeps run...

Snit
SubjectRe: Proof Sandman keeps running from.
FromSnit
Date08/03/2009 18:50 (08/03/2009 09:50)
Message-ID<C69C637D.3F98D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
FollowsSandman
FollowupsSandman (13h & 59m)

Sandman stated in post mr-B724D8.13484903082009@News.Individual.NET on 8/3/09 4:48 AM:

Sandman
In article <C69C14CD.3F8DD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:

Of course, I had to snipi away parts of your response and restore parts of what I wrote in order to make the later to be in response to the former - i.e. you like you did.

Snit
For crying out loud: you snipped dishonestly and I responded by putting your dishonestly snipped context *back*.

Sandman
AND dishonestly snipping my reply in the process. You *restored* content and you *removed* content. I.e. you forged the quote.

Snit
What, Jonas Eklundh, makes you think I have some obligation to quote your irrelevant grade school insults and clearly false accusations?

Sandman
What obligation do you think I have to quote your irrelevant trolling?

You have no obligation to quote anything I say - in fact, when you went some time ending your trolling of my posts I enjoyed it. But when you do quote me, you should do so *honestly*... but you repeatedly snip context in a dishonest way.

And, as we have seen, then you go post after post whining like a toddler about how I returned the context you dishonestly snipped. Wah wah... mean ol' Snit did not react to your dishonesty the way you liked. You have been crying over that for how many posts?

Snit
This whole like of BS from you is just to run from the fact that, in reaction to your belittling others skills, I pointed out problems with sandman.net - including your non-validating CSS. You made improvements based on my comments, but have been lashing out trolling me for *years* over that little "episode". How pathetic of you.

Sandman
I have been exposing your lies about my CSS for years, yes.

Your lies, Jonas Eklundh, are well documented. Your accusations enjoy *no* support. This is just a fact. Deal with it.

-- [INSERT .SIG HERE]

Sandman (13h & 59m)