Skip to main content
news

Re: mactard vs. mactard

Steve Mackay
SubjectRe: mactard vs. mactard
FromSteve Mackay
Date07/30/2009 20:05 (07/30/2009 13:05)
Message-ID<h4snid$4c4$1@news.albasani.net>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
FollowsSnit
FollowupsSnit (50m) > Steve Mackay
Steve Carroll (8h & 43m)

Snit wrote:

Snit
ed stated in post a4c35c3c-b55d-4f51-9ad0-de8ca710bdff@o13g2000vbl.googlegroups.com on 7/30/09 10:05 AM:

ed
On Jul 30, 9:16 am, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote: <snip>

Snit
Really the whole debate should be *long* dead. So Sandman made a silly mistake in, what, 2006... WHO CARES? Only Sandman...

ed
only sandman cares, but you're the one starting a new thread about it, when you're already having the same discussion in another thread? really? if you don't care, seriously, stop posting this crap, or at least stop making new threads about it (and don't revive (many) old threads about it either, as you've done in the past).

Snit
As I have said: if Sandman would just let it go I would not bring it up.

Duh! you /are/ the one that keeps bringing it up. http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2ac49cfb781c5779

He keeps bringing it up and lashing out over his anger from a debate from 2006!

Umm, no, he doesn't. You do.

But, sure, when he starts lying about me I reserve the right to prove him wrong.

I just wish he would let it go. It should be long dead. He made a mistake... we all do. Grow from the experience and move on.

See, you even lied about this... Do you /ever/ stop lying michael?

Do you desperately need attention that you have to keep posting separate threads, just to lie?

Snit (50m) > Steve Mackay
Steve Carroll (8h & 43m)