Subject | Re: Proof Sandman keeps running from. |
From | Sandman |
Date | 07/31/2009 21:41 (07/31/2009 21:41) |
Message-ID | <mr-CCC344.21410231072009@News.Individual.NET> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Snit |
Followups | Snit (37m) Snit (39m) Snit (41m) > Sandman Steve Carroll (4h & 15m) > Sandman |
SnitUnsupported claim #1
[0092] You blame me for *reacting* to your trolling (1) in a way [0092] that is not kind enough for your liking.
[0094] And you show you have no idea what you are talking about [0094] when you refer to the #1 professional web development tool [0094] as a "beginners" tool.Says the guy that doesn't even dare to link to his "professional" web pages he allegedly made for "clients" and instead only have linked to butt-ugly pre-newbie-stage pages that look like they're made by a four year old.
[0095] That does not mean, of course, that Dreamweaver is a Content [0095] Management System (though it can work with them).It's hilarious to read you trying to talk about these things :-D
[0096] Not sure what you mean, by the way, by getting "points" for [0096] having automatically validating CSS.I'm sure Steve understood perfectly though. You know, the person I was responding to.
[0107] Yet, years later, you are still clearly deeply angered [0107] by my pointing out something you say is of "little concern [0107] to " you and you know there is "no telling when something [0107] will break".What is "clear" to you, is seemingly unknown to everyone else. Any anger you feel is only in your mind. To clarify - no, I do not get angry when exposing your lies.
[0108] Here is my guess: I noted that your homepage did not [0108] validate correctly.Only if by "noted" you meant "lied".
[0109] As you note, your site has lots of dynamic features, [0109] including the CSS. [0110] When you checked, maybe it did. [0111] Instead of just saying that, you accused me of lying (17).Correction; I pointed out that you were lying, since I didn't thing you were mistaken, given your record for lying.
[0112] So I did a little bit of work and looked at the archived [0112] copies of your site. [0115] and *none* of them validated. [0116] Now that does not cover every second of the history of your [0116] site.You claim to realise that, yet can't admit that you have yet to support your lie.
[0117] *Maybe* there were unrecorded times before that when it did [0117] validate.I wouldn't know. I di know that it validated when you claimed it didn't. That's all I need to know.
[0119] Years later, though, you are still upset about this.I am still pointing out your lies when you post them here in csma, years after, yes.
[0125] though you have back pedaled and now claim you were accusing [0125] me of forging some *other* PDF not even related to the topic [0125] (I accept you have a problem with focus.No backpedalling took place. You have yet to support your unsubstantiated claim that I have said that those PDF's are forged. I very much think that they are, but I wouldn't claim they are without knowing - as with your earlier PDF's that you did forge.
[0129] There are all sorts of excellent Contact Management Systems.Whatever a "Contact" Management System is...
[0132] what does your home brewed one offer that they do not?Any questions from you will be answered in a reasonable manner the day you stop lying and trolling, as they were when you joined me in the Code of Honesty agreement, which you promptly broke.
[0133] Seems you are trying to re-invent the wheel.What things "seem" to someone using DreamWeaver and claiming that it's not a beginners tool is pretty much irrelevant to me :)
[0134] But to each his own.And lying is apparently your thing.