Skip to main content
news

Re: Proof Sandman keeps run...

Sandman
SubjectRe: Proof Sandman keeps running from.
FromSandman
Date07/31/2009 21:41 (07/31/2009 21:41)
Message-ID<mr-CCC344.21410231072009@News.Individual.NET>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
FollowsSnit
FollowupsSnit (37m)
Snit (39m)
Snit (41m) > Sandman
Steve Carroll (4h & 15m) > Sandman

Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote in <C69893D3.3F21B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>:

Snit
[0092] You blame me for *reacting* to your trolling (1) in a way [0092] that is not kind enough for your liking.

Unsupported claim #1

[0094] And you show you have no idea what you are talking about [0094] when you refer to the #1 professional web development tool [0094] as a "beginners" tool.

Says the guy that doesn't even dare to link to his "professional" web pages he allegedly made for "clients" and instead only have linked to butt-ugly pre-newbie-stage pages that look like they're made by a four year old.

[0095] That does not mean, of course, that Dreamweaver is a Content [0095] Management System (though it can work with them).

It's hilarious to read you trying to talk about these things :-D

[0096] Not sure what you mean, by the way, by getting "points" for [0096] having automatically validating CSS.

I'm sure Steve understood perfectly though. You know, the person I was responding to.

[0107] Yet, years later, you are still clearly deeply angered [0107] by my pointing out something you say is of "little concern [0107] to " you and you know there is "no telling when something [0107] will break".

What is "clear" to you, is seemingly unknown to everyone else. Any anger you feel is only in your mind. To clarify - no, I do not get angry when exposing your lies.

[0108] Here is my guess: I noted that your homepage did not [0108] validate correctly.

Only if by "noted" you meant "lied".

[0109] As you note, your site has lots of dynamic features, [0109] including the CSS. [0110] When you checked, maybe it did. [0111] Instead of just saying that, you accused me of lying (17).

Correction; I pointed out that you were lying, since I didn't thing you were mistaken, given your record for lying.

[0112] So I did a little bit of work and looked at the archived [0112] copies of your site. [0115] and *none* of them validated. [0116] Now that does not cover every second of the history of your [0116] site.

You claim to realise that, yet can't admit that you have yet to support your lie.

[0117] *Maybe* there were unrecorded times before that when it did [0117] validate.

I wouldn't know. I di know that it validated when you claimed it didn't. That's all I need to know.

[0119] Years later, though, you are still upset about this.

I am still pointing out your lies when you post them here in csma, years after, yes.

[0125] though you have back pedaled and now claim you were accusing [0125] me of forging some *other* PDF not even related to the topic [0125] (I accept you have a problem with focus.

No backpedalling took place. You have yet to support your unsubstantiated claim that I have said that those PDF's are forged. I very much think that they are, but I wouldn't claim they are without knowing - as with your earlier PDF's that you did forge.

[0129] There are all sorts of excellent Contact Management Systems.

Whatever a "Contact" Management System is...

[0132] what does your home brewed one offer that they do not?

Any questions from you will be answered in a reasonable manner the day you stop lying and trolling, as they were when you joined me in the Code of Honesty agreement, which you promptly broke.

[0133] Seems you are trying to re-invent the wheel.

What things "seem" to someone using DreamWeaver and claiming that it's not a beginners tool is pretty much irrelevant to me :)

[0134] But to each his own.

And lying is apparently your thing.

Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2009-01-01): +------------------------------+------------------------------+ | troll 1 2 | lying 1 18 | | incest 0 0 | sex 0 0 | | guilty 0 0 | honorable 0 0 | | obfuscate 0 0 | run 0 4 | | dishonest 0 4 | snip 0 4 | | lol 0 4 | contrived 0 0 | +------------------------------+------------------------------+ Snitanator v1.1 by Sandman

Snit (37m)
Snit (39m)
Snit (41m) > Sandman
Steve Carroll (4h & 15m) > Sandman