Subject | Re: Proof Sandman keeps running from. |
From | Snit |
Date | 08/02/2009 22:49 (08/02/2009 13:49) |
Message-ID | <C69B49EB.3F748%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Sandman |
Good to see you admit to it. Seriously, I am surprised to see you make this admission... and no need to even return context you had snipped... you jus flat our admitted to being dishonest. I am happy to see you at least come that far.SnitSandman
Clearly you are dishonestly snipping... and then lying and saying you are doing what I did when I *returned* other content you dishonestly snipped.
That's exactly what I did above.
You had snipped out the part I returned which made it look like your "Ok" was a response to something you had snipped out.I did no such thing. I *returned* the context you had dishonestly snipped. You are lying... but at least now you are *admitting* you are lying. That is a step in the right direction for you. Really.