Google| Subject | Re: Proof Sandman keeps running from. |
| From | Snit |
| Date | 08/03/2009 13:15 (08/03/2009 04:15) |
| Message-ID | <C69C14CD.3F8DD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Sandman (33m) > Snit |
Sandman stated in post mr-E12047.12432603082009@News.Individual.NET on 8/3/09 3:43 AM:
SandmanWhat, Jonas Eklundh, makes you think I have some obligation to quote your irrelevant grade school insults and clearly false accusations?
In article <C69C0276.3F8AF%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:SandmanOf course, I had to snipi away parts of your response and restore parts of what I wrote in order to make the later to be in response to the former - i.e. you like you did.Snit
For crying out loud: you snipped dishonestly and I responded by putting your dishonestly snipped context *back*.
AND dishonestly snipping my reply in the process. You *restored* content and you *removed* content. I.e. you forged the quote.
This whole like of BS from you is just to run from the fact that, in reaction to your belittling others skills, I pointed out problems with sandman.net - including your non-validating CSS. You made improvements based on my comments, but have been lashing out trolling me for *years* over that little "episode". How pathetic of you.
-- [INSERT .SIG HERE]
07/30/2009-
