Google| Subject | Re: mactard vs. mactard |
| From | Steve Carroll |
| Date | 07/31/2009 04:47 (07/30/2009 19:47) |
| Message-ID | <694d9c40-7e0f-496f-94cf-8981b338d99e@g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Snit |
On Jul 30, 1:47 pm, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:
SnitThat's rich... the thread has less than 20 posts and you're already pretending people are stupid enough to forget that you started the friggin' thing. This, despite the fact that anyone can easily read the first post in this thread any time they'd like. Wow... your drugs must be top notch, Snit. LOL!
Steve Mackay stated in post h4srlq$bb...@news.albasani.net on 7/30/09 12:15 PM:Steve Mackay
You point to the *middle* of a conversation and claim that supports me bringing the topic of the discussion up.That is when YOU brought it up. Sandman did not bring it up previously in that thread.Who do you think is foolish enough to believe *that*?Sandman is the one who keeps lashing out over his anger at his lies being pointed out in 2006.Now Michael, we all know YOU are the one bringing this crap up. It's been proven. No go back under your bridge where you belong, you slimy little troll.He should let it go. When he fails to do so, though, and lashes out against me, I reserve the right to remind him - and inform anyone else reading the thread - why Sandman is lying about me.This is just common sense.Get some help michael. You need it.Snit
I am not going to debate the obvious fact that you came into the middle of a "situation" and pretend I have started it.
07/30/2009-
