Skip to main content
news

Re: mactard vs. mactard

Snit
SubjectRe: mactard vs. mactard
FromSnit
Date07/30/2009 19:13 (07/30/2009 10:13)
Message-ID<C69722CC.3ED14%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Followsed
FollowupsSteve Mackay (52m) > Snit
Me (1h & 33m) > Snit

ed stated in post a4c35c3c-b55d-4f51-9ad0-de8ca710bdff@o13g2000vbl.googlegroups.com on 7/30/09 10:05 AM:

ed
On Jul 30, 9:16 am, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote: <snip>

Snit
Really the whole debate should be *long* dead. So Sandman made a silly mistake in, what, 2006... WHO CARES? Only Sandman...

ed
only sandman cares, but you're the one starting a new thread about it, when you're already having the same discussion in another thread? really? if you don't care, seriously, stop posting this crap, or at least stop making new threads about it (and don't revive (many) old threads about it either, as you've done in the past).

As I have said: if Sandman would just let it go I would not bring it up. He keeps bringing it up and lashing out over his anger from a debate from 2006! But, sure, when he starts lying about me I reserve the right to prove him wrong.

I just wish he would let it go. It should be long dead. He made a mistake... we all do. Grow from the experience and move on.

-- [INSERT .SIG HERE]

Steve Mackay (52m) > Snit
Me (1h & 33m) > Snit