Subject | Re: Proof Sandman keeps running from. |
From | Sandman |
Date | 08/03/2009 13:48 (08/03/2009 13:48) |
Message-ID | <mr-B724D8.13484903082009@News.Individual.NET> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Snit |
Followups | Snit (5h & 2m) > Sandman |
What obligation do you think I have to quote your irrelevant trolling?SnitSandmanSandmanSnit
Of course, I had to snipi away parts of your response and restore parts of what I wrote in order to make the later to be in response to the former - i.e. you like you did.
For crying out loud: you snipped dishonestly and I responded by putting your dishonestly snipped context *back*.
AND dishonestly snipping my reply in the process. You *restored* content and you *removed* content. I.e. you forged the quote.
What, Jonas Eklundh, makes you think I have some obligation to quote your irrelevant grade school insults and clearly false accusations?
This whole like of BS from you is just to run from the fact that, in reaction to your belittling others skills, I pointed out problems with sandman.net - including your non-validating CSS. You made improvements based on my comments, but have been lashing out trolling me for *years* over that little "episode". How pathetic of you.I have been exposing your lies about my CSS for years, yes.