Google| Subject | Re: WINDOWS 8 - ANOTHER MS WINNER |
| From | Flint |
| Date | 03/12/2013 17:45 (03/12/2013 12:45) |
| Message-ID | <khnlvr$4pc$1@dont-email.me> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Sandman (24m) > Flint |
On 3/12/2013 9:38 AM, Sandman wrote:
SandmanSo you keep saying, although unable to provide any cites of said rules. Is that because "The Comprenhesive Guide To English" by "The Mountain Monkey" is taking longer to type than previously anticipated?
In article <khna69$s8o$1@dont-email.me>, Flint <agent001@section-31.net>wrote:SandmanFlintFlintSandman
Soooo, idiot, where is the imperative or exclamation in your one word 'sentences'? Where is the implied "you" as required?
None is required.
You are incorrect.
Incorrect.FlintSandman
Without any of those, your sentences are nothing more than rjeindeer bleatings, and not proper sentences.
Incorrect.SandmanFlintFlintSandman
I find it amusing that you made such a lame attempt to refute the evidence I provided,
Ironic, given the fact that you provided no evidence other than to disprove your own claims.
How?
Read your link again.Flint"How?" is a question, just like how "Incorrect." and "Interesting." are assertions, all as valid as sentences according to English grammatical rules.
<--- (an example of an interrogative 'sentence' - hence aSandman
proper< simple sentence, wimpy word weegie.)
Not that you would know anything about that, of course, since you're being lectured by a Swedish guy.Apparently more than you.
-- MFBSandmanFlintFlintSandman
Give it up, Sandy. You have failed...*badly*. :)
Ironic.
Keep barking to me, Sandy! :)
Ironic.
03/06/2013-
