Google| Subject | Re: WINDOWS 8 - ANOTHER MS WINNER |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 03/14/2013 10:33 (03/14/2013 10:33) |
| Message-ID | <mr-A0F5C0.10330214032013@News.Individual.NET> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Flint |
| Followups | Rollo (4h & 59m) > Sandman |
In article <khqasp$h1f$1@dont-email.me>, Flint <agent001@section-31.net>wrote:
Haha, Flint is now trying to retcon this into him not at all thinking that was an "email address link" which he responded to with - and I quote: "Teeheeheheee"SandmanFlint
Hahahaha!!! What - didn't you use that "broken email address" to see my substantiation - I mean, you were just "playing" with me when you said - no INSISTED, that it was a broken email address!?
Exactly, it's silly to post message-IDs when many newsreaders don't newsreaders don't handle them from the message window. Not that they don't handle them at all, mind you
Teeheeheheee, indeed, Flint.
He subsequently said some really stupid things like:
<kho9fj$31k$1@dont-email.me> "Wrong, Ailin Bellyacher . An embedded "@" makes it a broken email link, moron."
He sure knew it was a Message-ID - he was just "playing" me in his response to... Alan. :-D
He then said this:
"Just because you fangurlz expect the rest of the world's usenet newsreader software to follow some non-standard MT-Newswatcher convention for creating broken links, don't assume such links are proper."
Yes, he actually thought a Message-ID was a MTNW "non-standard" link
-D
(as I indicated). But then I suspect you're too stupid to provide a TinyURL link instead, huh?TinyURL can't link to NNTP posts, Einstein. They can only link to HTTP pages. A Message-ID is a link to a specific Message on your NNTP server. This is a standard from 1983!!
Just like MT-Newswatcher posts broken truncated garbage for links, inserting message-IDs in the body of text is just flat out stupid.Hahahaqhahhahahahahhahahahahha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
But then the developers of Mozilla, SeaMonkey, (or even Outlook Express, FTM) aren't as smart as you, huh?Hahahahahahahhahhahahhahaha!!!!!!!!!!
Yes, you sure "Pointed it out" when you said this:SandmanFlint
I mean - you were "playing" *me* when you insisted *to Alan* that it was not a Message-ID, right? I mean, damn, that was such good fun play! Hahahah!!!
Yes it was, pointing out the silliness of your message ID.
<khodap$n9r$1@dont-email.me> "The smart thing for you to do is explain just on what basis you claim the software I use is broken because it doesn't handle his/your bogus formed message-ID links."
Yes, still thinking this is a "bogus formed" Message-ID (although, no longer a broken email link, so he must have googled some in between
-D)
Posting it in a body of text assuming it is a clickable link that works is indeed stupid. And yes, that is exactly what it works as - a BROKEN email link, idiot. Try it yourself with Thunderbird if you doubt it."An embedded "@" makes it a broken email link, moron."
Hahahaha!!!!!
Well, at least Flint has learned what a Message-ID looks like! My god what a troll wannabe newbie.
Come on, did you manage to figure out how to use that broken email address yet, Flint? Did you see Merriam Webster slap you so hard in your face that you may forget what a HTTP URI looks like?SandmanFlint
Surely now you are going to shove that back into my face here and now and follow/use/whatever that "broken email address" and disprove my substantiation? Surely?? Haha!!!
Hmmm... that's a good idea. I think I might just borrow it.
I'm going to have to digestify this!
-- Sandman[.net]
03/06/2013-
