Subject | Re: WINDOWS 8 - ANOTHER MS WINNER |
From | Sandman |
Date | 03/12/2013 13:02 (03/12/2013 13:02) |
Message-ID | <mr-1B13A4.13021412032013@News.Individual.NET> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
Follows | Flint |
Followups | Flint (1h & 22m) > Sandman |
FlintIncorrect.
I show you proof of what constitutes a >proper< sentence,
and you respond with a pasted dictionary response.Incorrect.
Soooo, idiot, where is the imperative or exclamation in your one word 'sentences'? Where is the implied "you" as required?None is required.
I find it amusing that you made such a lame attempt to refute the evidence I provided,Ironic, given the fact that you provided no evidence other than to disprove your own claims.
and it doesn't even apply to what we've been discussing.Incorrect.
Give it up, Sandy. You have failed...*badly*. :)Ironic.