Google| Subject | Re: WINDOWS 8 - ANOTHER MS WINNER |
| From | Alan Baker |
| Date | 03/12/2013 23:39 (03/12/2013 15:39) |
| Message-ID | <alangbaker-32EBFC.15394012032013@news.shawcable.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Flint |
| Followups | Flint (44m) > Alan Baker |
In article <kho9fj$31k$1@dont-email.me>, Flint <agent001@section-31.net>wrote:
FlintNo. You are quite incorrect.
On 3/12/2013 2:46 PM, Alan Baker wrote:Alan BakerFlint
In article <khnsdq$d37$1@dont-email.me>, Flint <agent001@section-31.net>wrote:FlintAlan Baker
On 3/12/2013 1:10 PM, Sandman wrote:SandmanFlint
In article <khnlvr$4pc$1@dont-email.me>, Flint <agent001@section-31.net>wrote:Sandman"How?" is a question, just like how "Incorrect." and "Interesting." are assertions, all as valid as sentences according to English grammatical rules.Flint
So you keep saying
Since I am correct.FlintSandman
although unable to provide any cites of said rules.
I did. here:
<mr-AA51C0.10344212032013@News.Individual.NET>
An email address link? Teeheeheheee! :)
No, you twit: a message ID.
If you had decent newsreading software, then clicking that would open this message:
Wrong, Ailin Bellyacher . An embedded "@" makes it a broken email link, moron. Just because you fangurlz expect the rest of the world's usenet newsreader software to follow some non-standard MT-Newswatcher convention for creating broken links, don't assume such links are proper.
Here is the appropriate excerpt from the headers of your post to which I am replying:
"References: <kh8gi8$din$1@dont-email.me> <mr-B6D567.08194207032013@News.Individual.NET> <kh9r5j$rp0$3@dont-email.me> <mr-BD956A.12274007032013@News.Individual.NET> <kh9u02$aai$2@dont-email.me> <mr-39C8A0.13175107032013@News.Individual.NET> <kha2le$3dp$1@dont-email.me> <mr-AFC7D3.14072707032013@News.Individual.NET> <khc5s3$r36$1@dont-email.me> <mr-145AB9.10132008032013@News.Individual.NET> <kheal2$mui$1@dont-email.me> <mr-AA5B1D.09081111032013@News.Individual.NET> <khkn1d$ogg$1@dont-email.me> <mr-45274C.15345511032013@News.Individual.NET> <khl4r1$eh3$1@dont-email.me> <mr-AA51C0.10344212032013@News.Individual.NET> <khn3rd$ond$1@dont-email.me> <mr-1B13A4.13021412032013@News.Individual.NET> <khna69$s8o$1@dont-email.me> <mr-1D660B.14385712032013@News.Individual.NET> <khnlvr$4pc$1@dont-email.me> <mr-B03FFE.18101112032013@News.Individual.NET> <khnsdq$d37$1@dont-email.me> <alangbaker-43AE3A.11461312032013@news.shawcable.net>"
Do you notice that the message-IDs it lists ALL have "@"s in them?
Do you see that in this header:
"Message-ID: <kho9fj$31k$1@dont-email.me>"
Do you see that your message-ID for your post has an "@".
Now, just to really shut you up, here's the link to the "Original Version" from Google Groups:
<https://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/322cf386b1c77d 94?dmode=source>
And if you look at it, it has exactly the same message-IDs, each with exactly the same "@" sign.
Besides, you miss the point. He never provided a cite as requested until *I* provided one he couldn't refute, and even then he provided an irrelevant cite.The classy thing to do at this point would be to admit you're wrong...
BTW, did you hear the latest? Judge Koh proved you to be full of shit.
-- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia "If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you sit in the bottom of that cupboard."
03/06/2013-
