Google| Subject | Re: An embedded "@" makes it a broken email |
| From | Flint |
| Date | 03/14/2013 14:08 (03/14/2013 09:08) |
| Message-ID | <khsi1e$dh0$1@dont-email.me> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Sandman (1h & 1m) > Flint |
On 3/14/2013 6:00 AM, Sandman wrote:
SandmanThat comment was directed to Alan, not you, therefore you were not 'played', sandy... you weren't even addressed as i was awaiting a response from you. Secondly, when inserted into the body of message text it DOES make it a broken email link.
In article <khqbif$lam$1@dont-email.me>, Flint <agent001@section-31.net>wrote:SandmanAlan BakerFlint
<http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1036>
Yes, we see you can't resist creaming your jeans. You're too dense to see I was simply playing with Sandflea
You sure played me here:
<kho9fj$31k$1@dont-email.me> "Wrong, Ailin Bellyacher . An embedded "@" makes it a broken email link, moron. "
And here:Yes, too bad you're too dimwitted to see the silliness of posting a message ID in a body of text when a simple excerpt of your own cite-blathering would have been more direct. That said, your doing so was to refute my claim that you failed to provide a cite of authoritative source to back *your* claim. However, the message you referenced does not contain a grammatically authoritative source, but simply a *dictionary*. A authoritative grammatical source is what is required for determining a sentence is valid(proper) or not. (Hint: there are different rules as to what one-word sentences are valid when
"Just because you fangurlz expect the rest of the world's usenet newsreader software to follow some non-standard MT-Newswatcher convention for creating broken links, don't assume such links are proper."
And my god, did you ever "play" me here:
"An email address link? Teeheeheheee! :)"
Hahaha!!!
spoken< as opposed to being >written< or >typed<.)Once again, YOU LOSE...
-- MFB
03/06/2013-
