Google| Subject | Re: WINDOWS 8 - ANOTHER MS WINNER |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 03/12/2013 14:38 (03/12/2013 14:38) |
| Message-ID | <mr-1D660B.14385712032013@News.Individual.NET> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Flint |
| Followups | Flint (3h & 6m) > Sandman |
In article <khna69$s8o$1@dont-email.me>, Flint <agent001@section-31.net>wrote:
Incorrect.FlintFlintSandman
Soooo, idiot, where is the imperative or exclamation in your one word 'sentences'? Where is the implied "you" as required?
None is required.
You are incorrect.
Without any of those, your sentences are nothing more than rjeindeer bleatings, and not proper sentences.Incorrect.
Read your link again.FlintI find it amusing that you made such a lame attempt to refute the evidence I provided,Sandman
Ironic, given the fact that you provided no evidence other than to disprove your own claims.
How?
<--- (an example of an interrogative 'sentence' - hence a"How?" is a question, just like how "Incorrect." and "Interesting." are assertions, all as valid as sentences according to English grammatical rules. Not that you would know anything about that, of course, since you're being lectured by a Swedish guy.Sandman
proper< simple sentence, wimpy word weegie.)
Ironic.FlintFlintSandman
Give it up, Sandy. You have failed...*badly*. :)
Ironic.
Keep barking to me, Sandy! :)
-- Sandman[.net]
03/06/2013-
