Google| Subject | Re: WINDOWS 8 - ANOTHER MS WINNER |
| From | Flint |
| Date | 03/12/2013 12:36 (03/12/2013 07:36) |
| Message-ID | <khn3rd$ond$1@dont-email.me> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Sandman (26m) > Flint |
On 3/12/2013 5:34 AM, Sandman wrote:
SandmanI'm reminded of when Q once said "Oh, BARK to me Worf!" with your limited mastery of single words.
In article <khl4r1$eh3$1@dont-email.me>, Flint <agent001@section-31.net>wrote:SandmanOnly, you're the one that repeatedly keeps claiming that "Interesting" couldn't be called a sentence. It was your claim, and as such, the burden of proof lies heavily upon your weak shoulders.Flint
Only, you are the one that made the claim of your one word response as being a sentence.
Incorrect.FlintSandman
I never disputed it was a sentence, I specifically stated it wasn't a >proper< sentence.
Which I correctly stated was an incorrect statement of yours.FlintSandman
I provided a reason as to of why I'm correct.
Incorrect.FlintSandman
You responded with yet another incorrect sentence.
Incorrect.FlintSandman
Furthermore, you're the one who repeatedly claims I'm incorrect.
Correct. As a service, free of charge.FlintSandman
That was your claim/assertion, and as such, the burden of proof for such lies heavily on your drowsey slumbering brain, numbnutz. So far, you have FAILED to do so.
I see you failed to provide substantiation for your claim, as predicted.SandmanWhy take you off the hook by pointing you to a dictionary when I am having so much fun making fun of your ignorance?Flint
OK, rjeindeer fjucker:
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Can_one_word_be_a_sentence
Yes.
Let me know whenever you need help having your ignorance shoved into your face again some more.
For more cake in your face, try out some real references:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sentenceSandmanTroll comeback superfail.Flint
Translation: You can't tell us what is so ironic, huh?
I'm quite sure I don't have what it takes to make you understand it, no. I think that would require staff with special education with disabled children.SandmanFlintSandmanIncorrect.Flint
English proper sentence FAIL.
Incorrect.
Yes, you are indeed incorrect.
Incorrect.
I show you proof of what constitutes a >proper< sentence, and you respond with a pasted dictionary response.
Soooo, idiot, where is the imperative or exclamation in your one word 'sentences'? Where is the implied "you" as required?
I find it amusing that you made such a lame attempt to refute the evidence I provided, and it doesn't even apply to what we've been discussing.
Give it up, Sandy. You have failed...*badly*. :)
-- MFB
03/06/2013-
