Google| Subject | Re: WINDOWS 8 - ANOTHER MS WINNER |
| From | Flint |
| Date | 03/12/2013 14:24 (03/12/2013 09:24) |
| Message-ID | <khna69$s8o$1@dont-email.me> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Sandman (14m) > Flint |
On 3/12/2013 8:02 AM, Sandman wrote:
SandmanYou are incorrect...*very* incorrect. Without any of those, your sentences are nothing more than rjeindeer bleatings, and not proper sentences.
In article <khn3rd$ond$1@dont-email.me>, Flint <agent001@section-31.net>wrote:FlintSandman
I show you proof of what constitutes a >proper< sentence,
Incorrect.FlintSandman
and you respond with a pasted dictionary response.
Incorrect.FlintSandman
Soooo, idiot, where is the imperative or exclamation in your one word 'sentences'? Where is the implied "you" as required?
None is required.
How? <--- (an example of an interrogative 'sentence' - hence aFlintSandman
I find it amusing that you made such a lame attempt to refute the evidence I provided,
Ironic, given the fact that you provided no evidence other than to disprove your own claims.
proper< simple sentence, wimpy word weegie.)
Keep barking to me, Sandy! :)FlintSandman
and it doesn't even apply to what we've been discussing.
Incorrect.FlintSandman
Give it up, Sandy. You have failed...*badly*. :)
Ironic.
-- MFB
03/06/2013-
