Subject | Re: I've seen LOTR |
From | Rimrunner |
Date | 01/21/2002 22:06 (01/21/2002 21:06) |
Message-ID | <slrna4p0mo.16n.rimrun@drizzle.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc |
Follows | Policrat |
PolicratLike pink bunny rabbits, yeah yeah yeah...
Do not underestimate the power of the Dark Rimrunner:On 20 Jan 2002 16:01:20 -0800, ObeeKris <obeekris@hotmail.com>wrote:PolicratBill AndersonVerklempt, c'est moi.
Bill Anderson <billanderson601@yahoo.com>wrote:C'PiBill Anderson
C'Pi wrote:Pleasurable to see. Entertaining to watch. All the emotional depth of a wet Kleenex.
I'll have you know that I've known some wet Kleenexes (Kleenexi?) that can get very emotional. Of course, some of them have a tendency to post here. :)
I cried at least twice the first time I saw the dang movie, and you know what? I don't care that y'all know that, now.
That's... *sniff*... so... *sniffle*... cute...
Hee!PolicratThat would sorta defeat the purpose...Bill AndersonI hope they do The Hobbit. Give me Gandalf and Bilbo and forget everybody else.
Including the dozen dwarfs they go running around with?
"Bilbo and the Twelve Dwarfs"
Yeah, like you're surprised.PolicratI'll take 'im.C'PiBill Anderson
and lovers in the moonlight,
I envy Viggo Mortenson.
You would!
The hat is really cool. I loved it because it's so overstated--I mean, it's like he's got an umbrella on his head. But it's the perfect wizard hat. I could totally imagine him keeping, say, a bottle of brandy in it, like the wizards of Pratchett's Discworld are said to do.I figured going in that even if the rest of the movie sucked, he'd be good. Big, big fan of his.And his pointy hat?
The leader was, at the very least. I think the actor's slated to be a Bond villain or something next. I don't know about the others.PolicratBill AndersonHee hee. Me, I just, uh, drooled a lot. Or something. I do think he did a very good job. The finale with the orcs was fabulous. (I thought Lawrence Makaore was good too, and *he* had several inches of latex to act through. And not much in the way of lines, either, aside from the growling.)
Viggo Mortenson as Aragorn. I thought he did a wonderful job with him, making him even cooler than in the book. I envy him for the kiss with Liv Tyler.
Hang on... Sauraman's Wehrmacht were... Maoris...?
Someone shoot George. Now.Which George?
Isn't Westron supposed to be English anyway?PolicratBill AndersonThat was great. I also liked the use of maps and so forth right out of the books.
The giant stone trolls in the background.
Aye... though what language were they written in?
Totally diggin' the pointy hat.And Gandalf's hat.<echo> And his pointy hat... </echo>
Or at least, Frodo and Sam were. Merry and Pippin joining them is never really explained, I chalk it up to them basically being hobbit teenagers (aren't they in their late 20s?) and going, "Adventure! Cool!" and not really realizing what they've gotten into until they lose Gandalf.PolicratBill AndersonMm, I keep going back and forth on that. A little more detail would've been nice...on the other hand, the movie's running time stands at 2:58 and a great deal was cut. I've heard varying lengths for the director's cut; the one I hear most often is 4:30. Dunno what else they could remove to make room for more exposition on the hobbits leaving the shire.
The dislikes (A much shorter list): The way the Hobbits leave the Shire. I think they could have done it just as shown in the book, with a few judiciously used captions.
C'mon... they were obeying orders... which made sense...
Well, in the book they *do* figure out where Frodo likely went, taking into account the missing boat, plus the missing Sam (and the missing Sam's gear). Conceivably they could cross the river and find the trail.PolicratBill AndersonYou could make that argument for how the book ends too, though. Aragorn decides to follow Merry and Pippin because the orcs leave a trail a blind rabbit could detect. "I must follow those whose trail I am sure of." Um, this *Ranger* isn't capable of tracking Frodo and Sam into Emyn Muil? Uh-huh. Methinks Tolkien just decided the group had to split up there, one way or the other.
Save for Gandalf, he knows best what dangers S&F are facing on the road to Mordor. "Their destiny lies along a different path." Well dammit, walk the path with them.
Consider, Frodo has gone across open water... are Rangers *that* good? Also, Aragorn probably *knows*... or maybe he's just a coward, reckons that Isengard is safer than Mordor... or maybe something dark deep inside him knows what the King-of-Gondor th?ng is with the ring... or maybe he knows that he couldn't keep away from the ring if he followed Frodo...?
I like the pointy ears, too.PolicratBill AndersonStar Power. (Yeah, yeah, I know. Uh, maybe so he could be heard more clearly?)
Other random stuff: In the battle at the beginning, why the heck wasn't Elrond wearing a helmet of some sort? *Everybody* else is except for him.
The ears...
True. Audiences, however, can be fairly obtuse.PolicratBill AndersonAt least one of the trailers out there makes it clear that a trilogy is to be expected. But yeah, a "To be continued" or something would've been nice.
I think they should have done something to indicate that the movie is going to be continued in "The Two Towers." At least a comment or something right after the shot of Sam and Frodo, but right before the credits. Because I have heard a couple of comments along the lines of "That's it? What happens next?" They should have done something for those who aren't aware that it's the first part of a trilogy.
It's fairly *obvious*...
Meanwhile, I'm going to console myself with "Black Hawk Down". I don't expect that Ridley Scott will entirely redeem himself in my eyes, but we'll see. Besides, from a totally fluffy, ignoring-the-subject-matter point of view, it's got Ewan *and* Orlando in it.PolicratBill AndersonMe either.
I don't want to wait another 11 months for "The Two Towers."
Aww...