Steve de Mena
On 8/18/12 8:33 PM, Alan Baker wrote: =A0

In article <lPmdnVj648gtPLLNnZ2dnUVZ_q6dnZ2d@giganews.com>,

=A0

=A0 Steve de Mena <steve@demena.com>wrote:

=A0

=A0

On 8/15/12 11:56 AM, Alan Baker wrote:

=A0

...and you trolls were all wrong!

=A0

=A0

<http://www.webmonkey.com/2012/08/no-more-flash-for-android/>

=A0

=A0

=A0

Phone makers and/or Adobe are doing a real disservice to their

=A0

customers by not making Flash available.

=A0

=A0

Actually, I think they're doing their customers a service by forcing

=A0

sites to provide content that isn't in a proprietary format.

=A0

=A0

=A0

It's an integral part of many of today's web sites, which are rendered

=A0

(or should I say NOT rendered) useless without Flash.

=A0

=A0

No. It is NOT an INTEGRAL part of many websites, Steve. Integral implie=

=A0

that there is no other way to deliver the same content.

=A0 =A0 =A0 How long has the iPhone been out now? 4 years? =A0 =A0 =A0 Seems a lot of sites haven't gotten the memo that they're being forced=A0 =A0 "to provide content that isn't in a proprietary format." Daily I read=A0 =A0 my Twitter feed and I see links to video stories that I can not play=A0 =A0 on my iPhone. =A0

=A0 =A0 Is this sort of like the US's embargo against Cuba? =A0 =A0 =A0 Steve