Google| Subject | Re: It's over, Apple was right... |
| From | Alan Baker |
| Date | 08/18/2012 04:38 (08/17/2012 19:38) |
| Message-ID | <alangbaker-0511EB.19381017082012@news.shawcable.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Nashton |
| Followups | Jack Spratley (2d, 8h & 46m) |
In article <k0muqj$tmr$3@speranza.aioe.org>, Nashton <nana@na.ca> wrote:
NashtonWe know. You had to buy two tablets to do the job of one.
On 12-08-17 11:28 AM, Laszlo Lebrun wrote:Laszlo LebrunNashton
On 08/17/2012 01:40 PM, KDT wrote:KDTLaszlo Lebrun
So, that also forced Google to not support Flash on Android in Chrome? RIM was able to get a source code license from Adobe to keep supporting Flash on Playbook -- if Flash were so important then why didn't Google do the same?
Who will know? Anyhow Microsoft got an agreement with Adobe as well to deliver Flash functionality on Windows8.
Personally, I appreciate being able to browse the web without restrictions imposed by some kook. I use a playbook and an Asus Windows tablet.
Whomever permits a third party to dictate what you should be able to do or not do is a moron of the highest order.You think that Adobe wasn't dictating with Flash?
LOL
Whomever advocates and becomes an apologist for said company is a waste of oxygen.-- "The iPhone doesn't have... ...well, since Edwin seems to have finally crawled away for good, I guess I'll let him off the hook
08/15/2012-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
