Google| Subject | Re: It's over, Apple was right... |
| From | Steve de Mena |
| Date | 08/21/2012 09:30 (08/21/2012 00:30) |
| Message-ID | <4uadncootLG1pK7NnZ2dnUVZ5uWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Alan Baker |
| Followups | Sandman (30m) KDT (8h & 51m) |
On 8/18/12 8:33 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
Alan BakerHow long has the iPhone been out now? 4 years?
In article <lPmdnVj648gtPLLNnZ2dnUVZ_q6dnZ2d@giganews.com>, Steve de Mena <steve@demena.com>wrote:Steve de MenaAlan Baker
On 8/15/12 11:56 AM, Alan Baker wrote:Alan BakerSteve de Mena
...and you trolls were all wrong!
<http://www.webmonkey.com/2012/08/no-more-flash-for-android/>
Phone makers and/or Adobe are doing a real disservice to their customers by not making Flash available.
Actually, I think they're doing their customers a service by forcing sites to provide content that isn't in a proprietary format.Steve de MenaAlan Baker
It's an integral part of many of today's web sites, which are rendered (or should I say NOT rendered) useless without Flash.
No. It is NOT an INTEGRAL part of many websites, Steve. Integral implies that there is no other way to deliver the same content.
Seems a lot of sites haven't gotten the memo that they're being forced "to provide content that isn't in a proprietary format." Daily I read my Twitter feed and I see links to video stories that I can not play on my iPhone.
Is this sort of like the US's embargo against Cuba?
Steve
08/15/2012-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
