Google| Subject | Re: It's over, Apple was right... |
| From | Laszlo Lebrun |
| Date | 08/21/2012 07:16 (08/21/2012 07:16) |
| Message-ID | <k0v5ip$7s9$1@tota-refugium.de> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.advocacy |
| Follows | Alan Baker |
| Followups | Alan Baker (5m) |
On 20.08.2012 22:02, Alan Baker wrote:
Alan BakerMaybe most people don't care about patented technology with potential fees... Well for 90% of the existing crap, delivering a shaky youtube camcorder .mov clip isn't an issue for many. They paid the fee already with the camcorder or their mobile.
In article <k0u3uo$7b5$1@tota-refugium.de>, Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com>wrote:Laszlo LebrunAlan Baker
On 20.08.2012 17:38, Alan Baker wrote:Laszlo LebrunWhat does that change? You CAN , you must not use H.264 with Flash. Your vistors, having Flash enabled, will always be able to see your content, across all platforms.Alan Baker
You were making a big deal about fees, Laszlo...
Exactly. Flash is free tu use by everybody, No fees whatsoever.
Not if it's H.264 in a Flash wrapper, it isn't. And that's what much Flash video is these days.
Whenever however H.264 will have got no alternative any more, then the patent holders will begin to hunt the big game... -- One computer and three operating systems, not the other way round. One wife and many hotels, not the other way round ! ;-)
08/15/2012-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
