Google| Subject | Re: The Lone Alien theory |
| From | Covenant |
| Date | 07/11/2001 20:01 (07/11/2001 19:01) |
| Message-ID | <9iirgo$juh$8@news6.svr.pol.co.uk> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | alt.cult-movies.alien |
| Follows | Keith Hazelwood |
"Keith Hazelwood" <nospam@nospam.net>wrote in message news:poankt0oau0e7p5fqhie6voes02dcvfl4r@4ax.com...
Keith HazelwoodHeh... It's ther facts as I see them. You've already read *my* opinion. You i know I disagree with yours..
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:44:12 +0100, "Covenant" <covenant@joelamb.freeserve.co.uk>wrote:Keith HazelwoodI don't see where belief enters into the equation. An alternate lifecycle is definitely not necessary, hence "unnecessary." And it's self-evident that any such addition, by its very definition, would add complexity.Covenant
You might well believe that...
*I* don't.
Thanks for the cogent rebuttal, Cov.
What else could one say?
-- Covenant A Man With Far Too Much Time On His Hands
07/08/2001-
