Google| Subject | Re: The Lone Alien theory |
| From | Covenant |
| Date | 07/09/2001 21:11 (07/09/2001 20:11) |
| Message-ID | <9icvgl$htv$1@news5.svr.pol.co.uk> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | alt.cult-movies.alien |
| Follows | Keith Hazelwood |
| Followups | Keith Hazelwood (9h & 10m) > Covenant |
"Keith Hazelwood" <nospam@nospam.net>wrote in message news:bidiktole6s322c9dtnj074mkg0revnaqj@4ax.com...
Keith HazelwoodYou might well believe that...
On Sun, 8 Jul 2001 19:32:50 +0100, "Covenant" <covenant@joelamb.freeserve.co.uk>wrote:CovenantKeith Hazelwood
Yeah... ever since ol Jimmy f****d with the life cycle I have been of the opinino that BOTH life cycles are valid.
Jimmy didn't f*** with the lifecycle. He saw a loose end and came up with an appropriate way to tie it up.CovenantKeith Hazelwood
It adds to the uniqueness of the entire species...
It adds unnecessary complexity is what it does.
*I* don't.
aCovenant
You're alone? You can create eggs with living victims... You are part of
Well... *I* don't see where the need would arise..hive? You don't need to...Keith Hazelwood
Ah, yes, the old "it's a 'perfect organism' so it can do anything" rationale. Why not just say they can sprout flowers out of their arse if the need arises?
-- Covenant A Man With Far Too Much Time On His Hands
07/08/2001-
