"According to James Cameron, yes. He didn't feel obligated to adhere
to it, as well he shouldn't. Sequel writers and/or directors"
Well, i agree and to some extent disagree with that statement.
Yes in the interest of creativity a film director/producer has a right to
ignore what has gone before, but then where does that leave the fan base
that gave money to the original and should want to see the sequel and fork
out their hard earned dollars/pounds. Upset the fan base and the movie will
sink like a lead fart, case in point - Alien 3.
"Humans are complex organisms too"
Very true, but we get thwarted by a cold. Prick us do we not bleed, well,
yes but it doesn't eat through the person who pricked us, was that
unnecessary complexity?, when you look at all four films, the only one to
really use that acid blood to any effect was number 4, when the aliens
killed one of their own to escape a cell.
"Since when does a character's abstract opinion qualify as a scientific
absolute? Ash said the alien is perfect, so it is? Indestructible
and infinitely adaptable? Gee, why not simply call them omnipotent?"
Hardly abstract, the character was a qualified science office, the operative
word being SCIENCE officer. Now I know it couldn't be absolute, but there
was no evidence at the time in the film to dispute the "perfect" analogy.
"And therefore good, eh? Why not let the aliens just degenerate into a
complete Borg-like parody of themselves. Hell, it just makes them
"more alien," right?"
I'm not sure where you're going with that, I meant that anything alien is
quite refreshing in films, but not necessarily good. If it did sprout
flowers from said butt, I would no longer be a fan of the series, but it
would definitely raise the question.. "How crazy was that flower/butt
scene?"