Google| Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 2014-05-04 09:26 (2014-05-04 09:26) |
| Message-ID | <slrnlmbr32.k3p.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Eric Stevens |
In article <dtqam910s4pq4qbrpn8a30bpiuuvhm5q50@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:
YOur ignorance is complete, yes. While my knowledge far surpasses yours, and using both my knowledge and experience, I gathered overwhelming evidence of the behaviour of the most used news clients out there.Eric StevensEric StevensSandman
Not that YOU KNOW OF! So you don't know that they don't either.
That's not a comeback. They don't do it any other way as far as YOU know either.
But I have no hesitation in admitting my ignorance while you pretend to have full knowledge.
Your responses have not contained a counter to that evidence.
I probably know more about Agent than you do. I just wasn't aware of the fact that it was so broken as to break out changed subjects as new threads by default.SandmanEric Stevens
Of the two of us, there is no doubt that I have the most experience with various news clients.
Might be so, but the evidence is that you have not delved very deeply into any. Hopefully you know more of at least one of them than you appear to do of Agent.
What's it to you? Why does it bother you if I dislike Agent? I am allowed to make derogatory remarks about poorly written software as much as I like.SandmanEric Stevens
Unless you can SHOW that many news clients break out changed subjects as new thread, just shut up about it.
As long as you stop making derogatory remarks about those that *can*.
-- Sandman[.net]
2014-04-14-
