Google| Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 2014-04-27 19:54 (2014-04-27 19:54) |
| Message-ID | <slrnllqh7f.42e.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Tony Cooper |
In article <vu9ql9pd497c6bhvt7c29nu8k9rhgkeo3b@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper wrote:
No, pizza wasn't a requirement for person A - who was the one who wanted to the pizza. It was a requirement for person B, who did NOT want to buy a pizza.SandmanSandmanEric Stevens
No, it wasn't logically correct. But I do understand that you would come in to defend him. Trust me, he needs all the help he can get. He's total road kill by now.
Person A who wants something specific done adds it as a requirement.
No, he doesn't. A requirement is something that HAS to be done, not something you WANT to be done.Eric StevensSandman
From then on persons B, C, D etc have to that specific thing.
Use it in an example.Person A wants a pizza, so he adds the "requirement" that for person B to visit him, he has to bring along a pizza, or else he's not welcome.The desire is a pizza The requirement for person B to visit is to bring a pizzaTony Cooper
And why did he add the requirement? Because he *wanted* that to be a requirement. Back to square one.
"A requirement is what you want todo" - Illiterate Tony
The time has passed a long time ago for you to withdraw gracefully from this, so just withdraw while you're way way behind.
-- Sandman[.net]
2014-04-14-
