Google| Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 2014-04-24 13:51 (2014-04-24 13:51) |
| Message-ID | <slrnllhuql.lp8.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Eric Stevens |
| Followups | Eric Stevens (10h & 48m) > Sandman |
In article <veohl9donm329bskcj97d3ek4cs97lvhv3@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:
True - but according to Tony, the support itself is always contained within the claim itself, if it is "sensible".SandmanTony CooperTony CooperSandman
If your irony meter is malfunctioning, maybe I can help you. I think you have it placed too close to your own posts. When you claim that someone else can't read or write English, and describe them as "illiterare", that just plays havoc with an irony meter.
I don't have a spell checker, since I post via slrn.
Then engage the brain. You should be able to look at a post before sending and spot great glaring errors like this.
There were not "great glaring errors", only small spelling errors.Why don't you engage your brain and spot enormous glaring errors before posting idiotic things like:Tony Cooper 04/22/2014 07:18:57 PM <as8dl99ia7cnvje70tn8pu82n5u2vaveef@4ax.com>"No, you support a claim by making a sensible claim in the first place."Eric Stevens
That's a good start. There is no possibility of supporting a stupid claim.
To test it, let's do this. Here is a claim from me:
"I drive a 2012 Dodge Charger SRT8"
Tell me, Eric, how that claim should be formulated in a supposed "sensible" way to contain the support for it being factual.
I know you can't answer that, and Tony can't either. That's what makes him illiterate. He can't express himself in a logical manner, nor can he read English and comprehend it.
Incorrect. Or else you just ignored the color of my socks, the middle name of my wife and the age of my children. Why did you ignore that, Eric?Sandman
Tony Cooper 03/25/2014 08:09:46 PM <sjj3j9tcphc4s5ha6dlibj8h9cv2bgtcl6@4ax.com>"If it isn't stated, it's ignored."Eric Stevens
Of course it's ignored.
To ignore something, it must be known to you and you then choose to refuse to acknowledge or take notice of it. The context in which Tony used this did not meet these requirements.
Incorrect. Especially given the fact that Tony's statement is that everyone else should use "Plugin for Photoshop", where copyright laws would apply the same way.Sandman
Tony Cooper 03/17/2014 01:29:18 PM <81qdi9p509anhalqskqa7cqu8d57g8412o@4ax.com>"Only Adobe can call a plug-in a "Photoshop Plug-in""Eric Stevens
When you consider copyright law you will know that is correct.
No comment about this gross error on Tony's part? Shocking :)Sandman
Tony Cooper 03/14/2014 03:46:13 PM <7e56i9130scf0vvr54pig09lpm1c1l8pv2@4ax.com>"All of the plug-ins I have for PS work in LR"
It's a direct quote, accompanied with a Message-ID.Tony Cooper 11/27/2013 04:03:26 PM <360c9956k64fpsu56a911250ggjs4no9qt@4ax.com>"A requirement is what you want to do."Eric Stevens
Of course, that's not quite what he said, is it?
-- Sandman[.net]
2014-04-14-
