Google| Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
| From | android |
| Date | 2014-04-28 12:10 (2014-04-28 12:10) |
| Message-ID | <bs6nonFqgu7U1@mid.individual.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Eric Stevens |
In article <it4rl9d6bkav6serqnb429bntn46vrgkha@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:
Eric StevensWell, in this case the references was in content of the articles too. Creating a new or, in this case modified subject is merely an aid or service to the reader. To keep things sorted 'n stuff...
On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 19:37:11 +0200, android <here@there.was>wrote:androidEric Stevens
In article <8t8ql9l6nvo03uvvdk3phfdepvkdl191et@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com>wrote:Tony Cooperandroid
Right. Absolutely right. A thread is *always* determined by the subject line. You created a new thread.
Silly me. I thought a thread was a series of articles with references in their headers to others. And that the original article would have no such references...
How's the weather? ;-)
The references are but a tool to enable management. What is and what is not a thread is in the mind of the reader. In my mind, a new subject is a new thread, irrespective of it's ancestry.
It's cool, sunny and blowing from the SW.
Your argument falls flat to the floor. -- teleportation kills http://tinyurl.com/androidphotography
2014-04-14-
