Google| Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize?? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 2014-04-29 07:48 (2014-04-29 07:48) |
| Message-ID | <slrnllufe6.b2u.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Tony Cooper |
| Followups | Eric Stevens (3h & 29m) > Sandman Tony Cooper (7h & 25m) > Sandman |
In article <a3ttl9hsvicda8d4efb2ids70vudgpcjr7@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper wrote:
What standards? I said non-standard, not "not conforming to standards for a newsreader". Why can't you read?SandmanTony Cooper
Oh, and please answer my related post as well -
We are still waiting for substantiation - which you "always" provide - that Forte Agent is a broken newsreader that doesn't conform to the standards for a newsreader.
Here's a screenshot of Unison (that Savageduck is using):
<
>Note that the post is part of the thread. Here is a screenshot of Thunderbird, which probably is the most used usenet reader:
<
>Note that the post is part of the thread. Here is a screenshot of slrn, which I am using. It's also an old school and proven client that has been around for ages:
<
>Note that the post is part of the thread. Here is a screenshot of tin, also a widely used oldschool client that has been around for ages:
<
>Note that the post is part of the thread. Here is a screenshot of GOogle Groups, which is an even bigger POS than Agent, but actually show threads correctly:
<
>Note that the post is part of the thread. I would have liked to show you a screenshot from MT-NewsWatcher, my favorite news cliet, that unfortunately isn't supported any longer and doesn't work on the latest version of OSX, but needlesstosay, it displays threads as they should be displayed, like in all the examples above.
See - plenty of substantiation. That's how it's done.
-- Sandman[.net]
2014-04-14-
