Google| Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize?? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
| From | Eric Stevens |
| Date | 2014-05-01 00:17 (2014-05-01 10:17) |
| Message-ID | <7ts2m9lt1ar4mrmp478el85rmhkv2irjon@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Sandman (8h & 51m) > Eric Stevens |
On 30 Apr 2014 11:33:29 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:
SandmanYou are a dishonest lying baboon!
In article <u0h1m9tg5uiib129aro8fsipi5pk33pp2m@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:
I originally wrote and you deleted:
... and it is that to which you responded. Notice my use of the word 'implied'.What you have implied is that there is some official standard that Agent does not conform with. You have yet to substantiate that.
I've pointed out previously that you tend to put up a great cloud of squink with the intention that your meaning will slowly congeal and drip from it. You use this as part of a debating trick to enable you to deny that you never used particular words which express that meaning more concisely. You have repeatedly described Agent as 'non-standard', 'non-compliant', 'broken' or words to that effect. Now you are trying to deny that you ever said anything like that. --Eric StevensSandmanClassic unsubstantiated claim.Eric Stevens
Loud Hyena laugh! You have consistently failed to substantiate your claim that there is some official standard that Agent does not comply with. Maybe five times now.
Produce a quote of me claiming there is an "official standard", Eric.
Down to quibbling over words are you now?Maybe English is too complicated for you.Sandman
You said I failed to substantiate a claim I never made.
Regards,
Eric Stevens
2014-04-14-
