Google| Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
| From | PeterN |
| Date | 2014-04-25 21:38 (2014-04-25 15:38) |
| Message-ID | <ljedj801184@news4.newsguy.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Tony Cooper |
| Followups | Tony Cooper (25m) > PeterN Sandman (21h & 12m) |
On 4/25/2014 11:53 AM, Tony Cooper wrote:
Tony CooperSorry to disagree. A requirement need not be something added. It can exist by implication.
On 25 Apr 2014 14:44:35 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:SandmanTony Cooper
Requirement - something you HAVE to do
After someone who wanted to do what the requirement requires adds it as a requirement. It does not exist until added, and it is added because someone wants it to be added.
A few hours ago I saw this tall, buxom blond woman who was in her late twenties, or early thirties, of the type that I would like to play windshield wiper with. Nobody has to add any requirements for that to happen. They exist by implication.
-- PeterN
2014-04-14-
