Google| Subject | Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby |
| From | Whisky-dave |
| Date | 2014-04-15 16:56 (2014-04-15 07:56) |
| Message-ID | <5ce5f6c7-20c1-4402-92d9-ce53715be548@googlegroups.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Sandman (22h & 39m) > Whisky-dave |
On Tuesday, 15 April 2014 14:34:39 UTC+1, Sandman wrote:
SandmanNo,
In article <a300c259-17b9-4ec1-962f-ddf5fd1459e9@googlegroups.com>, Whisky-dave wrote:SandmanUh, yeah? I was there, remember? It was a tiny store. Why is this a problem for you? Do you have some form of pride invested into the size of this store? Why? What's it to you?Whisky-dave
Didn;t look that tiny to me,
Where you there?
The photo on their site makes it look bigger than it is,Well there's a suprise, but it still looked far bigger to me than where I brought my 2nd camera. I can tell even from the outside. I had to order my canon A1 they didn't keep them in stock. No car parkign facilities you couldn't even park outside as it was a main road with no parking.
since it's taken with a wide-angle lens. It's really cramped and one small counter with some cameras behind. They have lots of stuff cramped into the shelves, for sure, but the store itself is pretty small.But it doesn't look as small as where I brough my camera not from the inside or out, I did notice the double swing doors.
I don't mind small stores, though, so it's no problem to me.Neither do I, I just wouldn't call the colonial... store small
2014-04-14-
