Google| Subject | Re: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby) |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 2014-04-24 13:37 (2014-04-24 13:37) |
| Message-ID | <slrnllhu0j.lp8.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Tony Cooper |
| Followups | Tony Cooper (2h & 57m) > Sandman |
In article <u97hl9lc6dp3u8thoqgqocf2orkek734p0@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper wrote:
Tony CooperSandmanTony CooperTony CooperSandman
If your irony meter is malfunctioning, maybe I can help you. I think you have it placed too close to your own posts. When you claim that someone else can't read or write English, and describe them as "illiterare", that just plays havoc with an irony meter.
I don't have a spell checker, since I post via slrn.
Then engage the brain. You should be able to look at a post before sending and spot great glaring errors like this.
There were not "great glaring errors", only small spelling errors.
The greatness and the glaringness are based on the context. The mistake of writing "since the person hasnt invited" (as you did in the post about your irony meter) was noticed but not called out. But, to misspell "illiterate" when you are calling someone else illiterate is both great and glaring.
Evidently, your defense is that you have nothing to engage.Engage?
Illiterate can mean "uncultured and poorly eductaed", which is clearly the meaning I used it in. You don't know how words are used or what they mean. You are poorly educated. Your spelling mistakes are not signs of illiteracy, and I don't engage in spelling flames (I think I have called out drunk Dave's enormous amount of spelling mistakes at some point though, but that's because his posts were next to unintelligible due to them).
When you can't read English to save your life, I call you illiterate, and when you can't write a coherent statement that is logical and factual, I call you illiterate. I wouldn't if it happened only once or twice, but it's all the time, like the quotes below.
That's something you will have to convince yourself with since you're illiterate and can't understand why they are errors.SandmanTony Cooper
Why don't you engage your brain and spot enormous glaring errors before posting idiotic things like:
None of the following are errors.
They are merely statements that you disagree with.Incorrect.
Not everyone would disagree with them. Few would, in most cases.Keep telling yourself that.
Tony thinks that one can support a claim by making a "sensible" claim. He clearly showcases his illiteracy and ignorance about the word "support".Sandman
Tony Cooper 04/22/2014 07:18:57 PM <as8dl99ia7cnvje70tn8pu82n5u2vaveef@4ax.com>"No, you support a claim by making a sensible claim in the first place."
This is a favorite of mine. One of your absolute dumbest claims ever.Tony Cooper 03/25/2014 08:09:46 PM <sjj3j9tcphc4s5ha6dlibj8h9cv2bgtcl6@4ax.com>"If it isn't stated, it's ignored."Tony Cooper 03/17/2014 01:29:18 PM <81qdi9p509anhalqskqa7cqu8d57g8412o@4ax.com>"Only Adobe can call a plug-in a "Photoshop Plug-in""
This was an incorrect statement to begin with, and even when both me and Savageduck had proved this to be true, Tony refused to retract the statement, trying to bend the English language to his will. Hilarious.Tony Cooper 03/14/2014 03:46:13 PM <7e56i9130scf0vvr54pig09lpm1c1l8pv2@4ax.com>"All of the plug-ins I have for PS work in LR"
What can I say? Totally illiterate and ignorant about the word "requirement".Tony Cooper 11/27/2013 04:03:26 PM <360c9956k64fpsu56a911250ggjs4no9qt@4ax.com>"A requirement is what you want to do."
-- Sandman[.net]
2014-04-14-
