Google| Subject | Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 2014-04-18 04:27 (2014-04-18 04:27) |
| Message-ID | <slrnll13hs.c2d.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Eric Stevens |
| Followups | Eric Stevens (2h & 10m) > Sandman |
In article <1h4uk9hbi4ec03cq6c6n0gt043s146e427@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:
Which would be statistically worthless even if we were only talking about one store, which we weren't.Eric StevensTony CooperSandman
I've made no claim for Best Buy stores other than the one store that I actually checked out.
Which renders the claim as statistical information worthless.
... except for the one store, as Tony stated.
Do you really think it can't be?SandmanEric Stevens
You mean, other than his explicit claim about: "I'd estimate that in somewhere around half the visits", which means that he has at least visited enough stores for a number of them being "about half", which puts it roughly in at least around ten stores (4/10 is "about half"), so he already has ten times as much statistical data than you (i.e. infintaely more, since you have none).
Do you really call an estimate "statistical data"?
-- Sandman[.net]
2014-04-14-
