Skip to main content
news

Re: Will Tony apologize? (w...

Eric Stevens
SubjectRe: Will Tony apologize? (was: Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby)
FromEric Stevens
Date2014-04-29 11:34 (2014-04-29 21:34)
Message-ID<i7sul9ll2bnthiqq5s3pkasoma3b777hkg@4ax.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
Followsandroid
Followupsandroid (8m)
Sandman (3h & 26m)

On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 07:51:20 +0200, android <here@there.was>wrote:

android
In article <nfcul9ll4pse7unk3pq1calh55vq9fobs9@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:

Eric Stevens
rOn Tue, 29 Apr 2014 06:28:09 +0200, android <here@there.was>wrote:

android
In article <p7gtl9dii0l62chbpmgmfn0alp7ijql748@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:

Eric Stevens
On 28 Apr 2014 08:59:07 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:

Sandman
In article <j45sl99d2e8dpisaoqe48vqgtclgraek94@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:

android
In article <8t8ql9l6nvo03uvvdk3phfdepvkdl191et@4ax.com>,

Tony Cooper
Right. Absolutely right. A thread is *always* determined by the subject line. You created a new thread.

android
Silly me. I thought a thread was a series of articles with references in their headers to others. And that the original article would have no such references...

How's the weather? ;-)

Eric Stevens
The references are but a tool to enable management.

Sandman
Management of what?

Eric Stevens
Of the sequencing of the articles.

Sandman
Make up your mind. The post in question:

<slrnll8p8n.sun.mr@irc.sandman.net>

Had content in it's References header, something you now agree is to be used to manage the sequence of the article in relation to other articles (i.e. the thread) yet you seem to ALSO claim that it is a completely new thread, meaning that it should NOT be sequenced with other posts.

Please clarify.

Eric Stevens
You are either very dense or being deliberately difficult.

It's a new subject descended from a chain of articles dealing with a different subject.

android
A new thread would require a new and not modified subject, new content with out references to another article in order to continue an argument and no references in the headers. The last would be hijacking an old thread since some folks might have marked it and there newsclients might highlight it for them thus giving the articles undue exposure....

Eric Stevens
It seems as though there are as many ideas of what makes a thread as there are people. In the end I guess it depends upon how each person, personally, wants to file the articles they receive. I'm not going to ram any particular definition down anyone's throat.

android
So why does this interest you? Are you fishing for conflict? In love with the heat of battle are you?

You obviously don't care about the issue!

Where have you been?

I am responding to the loathsome Jonas Eklund (who hides his identity under the nom de plume of 'Sandman') who insists that there is only one way to do it, and that the way I have configured Agent (my newsreader) is somehow non-standard and broken. In spite of me asking him several times, the creature has never been able tocome up with a reference to any standard which justifies his claim. The paragraph of mine to which you are responding should show you that I am the tolerant one. --

Regards,

Eric Stevens

android (8m)
Sandman (3h & 26m)