Skip to main content
news

Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby

Tony Cooper
SubjectRe: Colonial Photo & Hobby
FromTony Cooper
Date2014-04-17 00:56 (2014-04-16 18:56)
Message-ID<9j2uk9ha0peiesffrv8ncganuris6lihec@4ax.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
FollowsSavageduck

On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 07:18:10 -0700, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>wrote:

Savageduck
On 2014-04-16 13:34:11 +0000, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>said:

Sandman
In article <s69rk9dqeaov7ksrm8v5uo7cpkrpn5ln81@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:

From recommendation from Tony, I went to Colonial Photo and Hobby, just to check it out. Was a really small store with one half hobby and the other photo-related stuff. Pretty cramped, but really nice british salesman that I talked to.

Eric Stevens
Here is their web site. It gives some idea of their size. http://www.colonialphotohobby.com/index.htm

Sandman
Uh, yeah? I was there, remember? It was a tiny store. Why is this a problem for you? Do you have some form of pride invested into the size of this store? Why? What's it to you?

Eric Stevens
Size is a relative thing, especially if you judge by the size of B&H or similar.

Sandman
Colonial was slightly bugger than B&H, but B&H was also very tiny.

Savageduck
"bugger"???

"...B&H was also very tiny."???

None of that response makes any sense at all.

As our Brit friends might say, "He knows bugger-all about size".

-- Tony Cooper - Orlando FL