Skip to main content
news

Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby

Savageduck
SubjectRe: Colonial Photo & Hobby
FromSavageduck
Date2014-04-19 00:19 (2014-04-18 15:19)
Message-ID<2014041815195625550-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
FollowsEric Stevens
FollowupsSandman (22h & 21m) > Savageduck

On 2014-04-18 22:09:40 +0000, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>said:

Eric Stevens
On 18 Apr 2014 11:07:32 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:

--- snip ---

Savageduck
"...B&H was also very tiny."?? Those are your words aren't they? If you consider B&H "very tiny" what exactly do you consider a large store?

Sandman
B&H's camera section was tiny. I wasn't talking about the entire store, just as I didn't include the size of the entire Colonial store either, since it's some 70% hobby things like model airplanes and such.

Savageduck
B&H is a massive store, the furthest from *very tiny* that anybody could possibly imagine. Take a look at their store information video at full screen.

Sandman
I am fully aware of the size of B&H. I was at on in the Florida Loop. It wasn't "massive", but sure, it's a big store.

Eric Stevens
Are you talking about the B&H in New York?

We have already established that Jonas has mixed up and misidentified a Florida Best Buy as B&H Photo Video of NYC. B&H has no presence in any State other than NY. Its global online reach negates that necessity.

Now we just have to see if Jonas acknowledges his error.

-- Regards,

Savageduck

Sandman (22h & 21m) > Savageduck