Subject | Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby |
From | Tony Cooper |
Date | 2014-04-15 23:39 (2014-04-15 17:39) |
Message-ID | <8j9rk9pfkl0usk0st58dc1qni2c1o8ga92@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (16h & 26m) |
SandmanOne store, one informal survey, is miles ahead of a vague claim of "often". Better than a visual airplane aisle market share analysis.
In article <655qk9pcrvmt7ct2vp6f0dbnk38rbcj5c7@4ax.com>, Tony Cooper wrote:SandmanTony CoopernospamTony CooperTony Coopernospam
I think, based on a comment by you some time ago, I did check a Best Buy and found one of 24 that wouldn't turn on and reported that information here. I wouldn't call that "often".
you think wrong.
Well, you consider 4-point-something percent of the display models to be without a battery to be enough to be "often", so that shows your aptitude in assessing a problem. It does cast doubt on your use of "numerous", though.
where did you come up with 4.something% ? oh yea, your ass.
24 cameras on display, 1 non-working (presumably w/o battery) 4.something percent non-working. An even 4% would be less than one unit.
Ironic that you should talk about problem-assesing when your number is based on one visit to one store.Tony CooperSandman
It's right up above. You need to download an app to do the math?
And classic troll insults.