Skip to main content
news

Re: Colonial Photo & Hobby

Whisky-dave
SubjectRe: Colonial Photo & Hobby
FromWhisky-dave
Date2014-04-25 14:51 (2014-04-25 05:51)
Message-ID<e5c3cf6b-294a-4aee-9c9d-07465b2aac00@googlegroups.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
FollowsSandman

On Friday, 18 April 2014 03:30:31 UTC+1, Sandman wrote:

Sandman
In article <afab7373-f8c4-429c-a86a-5decc7660ffb@googlegroups.com>, Whisky-dave wrote:

Colonial was slightly bugger than B&H, but B&H was also very tiny.

Whisky-dave
In what way do you mean smaller on the inside like the Tardis ?

Sandman
The Tardis is bigger on the inside, Dave.

No it is not. A common mistake to make. The Tardis looks larger inside than it does from the outside, or as one the most recent assistants said, it loks smaller on the outside. The internal volume of the Tardis is NOT greater than that of the Earth it is not infinate either.