Google| Subject | Re: Is RGB to Lab lossy? - was(Re: Lenses and sharpening) |
| From | nospam |
| Date | 2014-10-06 03:05 (2014-10-05 21:05) |
| Message-ID | <051020142105196463%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | PeterN |
| Followups | PeterN (40m) > nospam Eric Stevens (7h & 25m) |
In article <m0sgku32i4g@news6.newsguy.com>, PeterN <peter@verizon.net> wrote:
that's your problem. dan is wrong and reading his books has led you astray.PeterNPeterNnospam
I gaae him some common uses. He typically uses "edge case' to give him wriggle room.
wrong again.
what i call an edge case is an edge case and what you're calling common can be done *without* lab more easily and with better quality results.
in other words, you're blaming others for your own lack of knowledge and unwillingness to learn.
Well then explain with facts and detail. Warning. I have Dan's book and will use it as a reference.
if you read other books, you'll see that they consistently prove just how much of an idiot dan really is. i've mentioned two such books in this thread and other books in other threads.
2014-09-13-
